happy halloween!
I usually try to avoid the annoying morning show radio blather, but this morning I overhead a conversation that piqued my interest.
On of the guys was lamenting the fact that his parents live in a "wealthy" neighborhood and that in recent years, kids from well outside his city limits have been coming to his neighborhood to do trick or treating. He even said one year there were gang bangers and other such scary teenagers. It was so busy, in fact, that his parents have to spend over $350 on Halloween candy to avoid the "tricks" that come when you run out.
Immediately, the other three people with microphones began harrassing him that he's lucky to be in such a neighborhood and why can't other kids come from different areas to trick or treat? But that's not the point. The point is that his parents worked hard for what they have and where they live. They shouldn't be subtly threatened to give candy to hoodlums from other cities when they all have their own neighborhoods. They kept saying, His parents can afford the candy, so why not give it away?
This simple conversation about candy on a holiday sums up what is wrong with government. The rich have a lot. They probably didn't work very hard for it. They probably oppressed some other person to get it, so let's take it away and give it to someone who has been lazy and/or causing trouble for most of their lives. I was enraged.
Until they played some audio clips of the guy being the Halloween bouncer for his neighborhood by asking various kids where they lived:
"Trick or treat, Grim Reaper. Where do you live?"
"Like 7 houses down."
"Good. Here's some candy. Trick or treat little princess. Where do you live?"
"Alhambra."
"Sorry, no candy for you. Try the next house."
His argument was that if enough people did that, people would stop driving their kids to the "white neighborhoods" and kicking them out of the vans.

Rox on Fox